Comparing Filtration With Reverse Osmosis
Comparing Filtration With Reverse Osmosis
Comparing filtration with reverse osmosis is like comparing two brothers with almost the same
features, only with different ages perhaps. This is because the principle used by both systems is
the same filtering sediments out of the water.
Let us look first into reverse osmosis.
Reverse osmosis
Because of its present capacity of filtering some of the minutest substances on earth, the process
of reverse osmosis is sometimes called hyper filtration. It allows the removal of particles as
small as ions from a liquid solution.
The most common use for reverse osmosis process is in purifying water. It is used to remove salts
and other impurities to restore the waters color, taste, and its other properties.
The process is also used to purify other fluids such as ethanol and glycol by removing their
contaminants and purify them for better functions.
The heart of the reverse osmosis process is the semi-permeable membrane that allows the fluid being
purified to pass through while blocking the contaminants.
Another vital requirement to the system is the driving force that pushes the liquid through the
membrane. The most common device used is a pump. The stronger the pressure needed, the bigger the
driving force should be.
Nowadays, most reverse osmosis processes now incorporates the use of crossflow, the additional
process where the membranes clean themselves during the operations.
As some of the fluid passes through the membrane the rest continues downstream, sweeping the
rejected species away from the membrane.
To date, reverse osmosis is capable of straining bacteria, salts, sugars, proteins, particles,
dyes, and other chemical constituents.
Filtration - How does it work?
Filtration involves water flowing through a granular bed of sand (or any other suitable filtering
medium) at a low speed. The action permits the filtering media to retain most solid materials while
permitting water to pass through.
To ensure adequate removal of unwanted particles, the process of filtration is usually repeated.
This process is generally known as slow sand filtration. It is the oldest method of filtration but
still in use up to this day.
The more modern filtration systems today use carbon as the filtering medium. The carbon is
compressed into solid blocks. (This is in direct contrast to the old loose granular sand filters of
old.) The carbon filters in solid blocks often include other media substances, and called
multimedia filters. This new type of filter works together and in both ways, chemically and
physically.
Physically, it duplicates the old work of the slow sand filters: blocking the passage of unwanted
materials with molecular structures larger than that of water.
Chemically, it does additional work by the process of absorption. With it, the atomic charge of the
carbon and other media encourages unwanted particles to abandon their bond with the water and
attach themselves to the filter. The other media included in the filter are designed for more
particles to bond with it.
Water is then directed to several stages of carbon and multimedia filters to ensure removal of more
unwanted materials. The first removes the most concentrated chemicals (chlorine, etc.) and the
other next stages are for the removal of smaller and more hard-to-get chemicals like
pesticides.
Some notes on reverse osmosis and filtration
Carbon and multimedia filters possess the same purifying capabilities as reverse osmosis and
distillation. All three filtration, distillation, and reverse osmosis are all able to remove
dangerous chemicals.
The slow process of carbon and multimedia filters does not need expensive energy sources like
distillation (heat) and reverse osmosis (force pump), thereby making it cost-effective. It wastes
little water in the process, too.
Again, when comparing filtration with reverse osmosis, the issue might all boil down again to
cost-effectiveness in maintenance and ownership of either of these water-purifying systems.
|